Empathy, Power, and Performance: What the Diddy Documentary Teaches Us About Reading Human Behavior
- Matthew Sexton
- Jan 6
- 3 min read
Updated: 3 days ago

The Netflix documentary Sean Combs: The Reckoning, produced by 50 Cent, has ignited intense public conversation — not only about power, accountability, and the entertainment industry, but about empathy, and how easily it can be misunderstood, performed, or manipulated.
The documentary presents interviews, allegations, and behind-the-scenes footage that lead viewers to ask a deeper psychological question:
How do we tell the difference between genuine emotional empathy and a performance designed to influence others?
Empathy is not one thing. It has layers, pathways, and different functions in the brain. And when we don’t understand those differences, we risk believing behaviors that may not reflect someone’s true emotional reality.
Emotional Empathy: Feeling What Another Person Feels
Emotional empathy (affective empathy) refers to the ability to feel another person’s emotional state in your own body.This is a limbic-system response — fast, intuitive, bodily.
Signs of emotional empathy include:
Your chest tightens when someone cries
You feel anxious when someone else is panicking
Someone’s joy makes you feel elevated
It is felt, not calculated.
The documentary shows moments where people describe interactions with Diddy in which his behaviors appeared warm, caring, or understanding in certain contexts. Whether those moments reflected genuine emotional empathy cannot be concluded by viewers — but it raises the important point:
Emotional empathy can be mimicked.People can learn the behaviors of empathy — concern, softness, sympathy — without actually experiencing the emotional resonance internally.
This is why emotional empathy is powerful, but deceptive when used performatively.
Cognitive Empathy: Understanding, Predicting, and Influencing
Cognitive empathy is completely different.
It is the ability to:
Understand what someone else is feeling
Anticipate their reactions
See the situation from their point of view
Use emotional knowledge strategically
This is not a “felt” process.It is a thinking process.
Cognitive empathy allows someone to read people with accuracy, charm, and sophistication — even if they do not emotionally resonate with others.
Many high-powered individuals, entertainers, leaders, and manipulators rely heavily on cognitive empathy because it helps them:
Influence others
Build alliances
Stay socially adaptive
Control their image
Anticipate consequences
The documentary includes interviews where insiders describe charisma, charm, seduction, reassurance, and moments of apparent understanding. Again — these depictions don’t reveal what was happening internally for anyone involved. But they demonstrate how cognitive empathy can create the appearance of emotional closeness.
Cognitive empathy isn’t inherently bad — great therapists, leaders, and negotiators use it ethically.But without emotional empathy or moral grounding, it can become a tool of manipulation.
When Emotional Empathy Is Performed, Not Felt
People often confuse empathy with the performance of empathy.
The documentary forces viewers to sit with a difficult truth:
Someone can look empathetic without actually being empathetic.
Just because a person:
Apologizes
Cries
Appears vulnerable
Speaks softly
Expresses care
Uses emotional language
…does not mean they feel what they’re describing.
Humans are incredibly skilled at reading social cues and producing the expressions that evoke sympathy or trust.
This is why empathy without boundaries is dangerous.You can be emotionally moved by a performance — and not realize it’s a performance.
The Only Part We Actually See: Behavior
Here is the grounding truth:
**We cannot see someone’s feelings.
We can only see their actions.**
We can’t see someone’s intentions.
We can’t see their internal emotional resonance.We can’t see whether their empathy is felt or performed.
What we can observe are patterns:
Do their behaviors align with their words?
Do they cause harm and then repeat the harm?
Do apologies lead to change?
Do they take accountability or avoid it?
Do they use charm to deflect consequences?
Do their actions show care, or do their actions contradict their claims?
Whether we’re talking about celebrities, partners, leaders, or anyone in our lives…
You judge character by behavior, not by what someone says about themselves.
This is why the documentary sparks so much conversation:it shows actions, accounts, footage, and patterns — and actions are the only evidence people actually have.
Empathy can be faked.Feelings can be performed.Intentions can be hidden.
Behavior is the only real data.




Comments