The Invisible Pay Cut: How Insurers Downcode a Therapy Session Without Denying It

Quick answer: A commercial insurer does not have to deny a claim to cut a therapist’s pay. It can pay the claim and reclassify the session to a shorter, cheaper code. Under commercial insurance in 2026, a 53-minute session billed as CPT 90837 usually pays about 15% to 25% more than the shorter 90834, per MedsoleRCM (2026). Cigna began doing a version of this automatically on October 1, 2025, through a policy it calls Evaluation and Management Coding Accuracy, paying the lower-level code and marking the change on the payment slip, per Cigna’s provider notice (2025). Nothing gets denied. So there is nothing to appeal in the usual way.

Most people picture the fight with an insurer as a denial. A big red stamp. A letter that says no. You appeal, you send records, you wait, and maybe you win.

Downcoding skips all of that. The claim gets a yes. The money that arrives is just smaller than the money that was earned. The session happened, at the length it needed to be, and then the code changed on the way to the check. I am a licensed clinical social worker, and this is the quietest way I have seen the system trim a clinician’s pay without ever telling them no.

What downcoding actually is

Every therapy session gets a billing code. The code is mostly about time and complexity. CPT 90837 is a 53-minute-or-longer individual session. CPT 90834 covers 38 to 52 minutes. CPT 90832 covers 16 to 37 minutes, per Upstate Healthcare Admin (2026). Longer and more involved pays more. That is the whole idea.

Downcoding is when the insurer pays the claim but swaps the submitted code for a cheaper one. The 53-minute session gets reimbursed like a 45-minute session. The complex visit gets paid like a routine one. The clinician did the longer work. The plan pays the shorter rate.

A denial and a downcode are not the same animal, and the difference is the point. A denial is loud. It creates a record, it triggers appeal rights, and it shows up in the parity numbers regulators watch. A downcode is a paid claim. It looks like the system worked. The clinician has to notice the shortfall, prove the original code was right, and chase the gap on their own time. Most of that time is unpaid.

Door one: the automated repricing

Here is the clearest live example. On October 1, 2025, Cigna put a policy into effect called Evaluation and Management Coding Accuracy, internal number R49. It targets certain higher-level office-visit and consultation codes: 99204 and 99205, 99214 and 99215, 99244 and 99245, per Cigna’s provider notice (2025).

Read the mechanics closely, because they are the whole story. When Cigna’s records show a provider bills the high levels more often than their peers for routine work, the claim is “adjusted by one level only,” and Cigna will “issue payment promptly for the lower-level adjusted code,” with the change noted on the explanation of payment. No documentation request first. No hold. Pay now, at the lower number, and flag it on the slip.

Those E/M codes matter to mental health more than the numbers suggest. They are what psychiatric prescribers and many behavioral-health providers bill for medication-management visits, often stacked with a psychotherapy add-on. A standalone talk-therapy 90837 is not on Cigna’s automated list. But the model it proves is the one to watch: an insurer can reprice a paid visit by algorithm, at scale, and simply tell you after the fact.

Cigna says almost 99 percent of in-network providers will not be affected at the start, including more than 97 percent of those who regularly bill the top E/M levels, per the same notice. That framing is doing work. It says the net is narrow. It also means the burden of proof now sits with the clinician. If you land in the flagged group, you can ask Cigna to reconsider individual claims, and after five or more adjusted claims you can request a bypass, granted only if a review finds at least 80 percent were billed correctly (The Intake, 2025). You appeal to get back to the rate you already earned.

Door two: the letter that makes you cut your own pay

The second door is softer, and in some ways smarter. It does not touch the claim at all. It changes the clinician’s behavior before the claim is ever sent.

Anthem reviewed a full year of its paid claims, calculated the average use of the 90837 code for each provider specialty in each market, and compared individual clinicians to that baseline. Anyone using the long code more than their peers got a letter, per The Insurance Maze (March 2025). The letter’s tone was gentle. Anthem said it was “strictly educational” and that “we are in no way asking you to change the way that you provide care.”

Then people did exactly that. Many therapists started billing the shorter 90834 instead of 90837, not because their sessions got shorter, but because a letter comparing them to a market average is a quiet threat about a future audit. That is the mechanism. You do not have to deny anything, or even downcode anything yourself, if you can get the clinician to downcode preemptively out of caution. Optum, UnitedHealth’s health-services arm, is named as running stricter policies still.

The professional bodies saw the play. The APA Practice Organization and the Pennsylvania Psychological Association stepped in to say that legitimate 90837 billing should not be penalized, per The Insurance Maze. The guidance from clinicians who know the codes is consistent: if the session ran 53 minutes and the note supports it, the code is 90837. Fear is not a documentation standard.

Why it costs 15% to 25%, and why you never see it

Put a number on the gap. Under commercial insurance in 2026, a 90837 session usually pays about 15% to 25% more than a 90834 session, per MedsoleRCM (2026). In common commercial ranges, the longer session runs about $125 to $165 and the shorter one about $100 to $135, per Upstate Healthcare Admin (2026). Both figures are commercial, not government rates.

On a single session, that spread is maybe twenty or thirty dollars. Easy to shrug off. Now run it across a caseload. A clinician who sees twenty-five people a week, most of them at the length that calls for the longer code, is looking at a four-figure annual difference if those sessions get repriced or preemptively shortened on paper. That is a raise handed back, silently, with no negotiation and no notice.

The reason you never see it is structural. A downcode does not generate the paperwork a denial does. When claims run through a billing platform or a marketplace intermediary, the adjustment can land without the provider being clearly notified at all (DNP Consulting, 2025). The clinician has to read every remittance line by line to catch it, which most solo practices do not have the hours to do. The cut is designed to be missed.

Who this is really aimed at

I want to be precise about the villain here, because it is not the person across from you in the room. It is the payment logic of the commercial plan.

A denial is a cost center for an insurer. It creates appeal rights, it shows up in the metrics that parity regulators track, and it invites lawsuits. A downcode does none of that. It is a paid claim with a smaller check, and on every dashboard it reads as normal. That is why it is spreading. It captures the same savings a denial would, without the fingerprints.

This sits on top of a gap that is already measured. Inside the same commercial plan, medical and surgical office visits pay clinicians more than mental health visits do, which I walked through in our piece on reimbursement rates. Downcoding widens that distance one repriced session at a time. It is a cousin of the marketplace rate-flattening happening on platforms like Headway and Alma, which I covered in The Marketplace Tax. Different door, same house.

And there is a behavioral-science tail on this that should worry anyone who wants therapy to work. Pay a 53-minute session like a 45-minute one, often enough, and you teach a whole field to book shorter sessions. People respond to incentives, clinicians included. The trauma work, the couples work, the crisis session that cannot be rushed are exactly the visits the long code exists to protect. Reprice them quietly, and you nudge care itself to get thinner, one calendar block at a time.

What this means for 2026

For clinicians, the move is unglamorous but real: read your remittances. The gap between the code you sent and the code that paid is where this lives. Document to the code, bill the code the session earned, and treat a downcode as an appeal you are owed, not a rate you accepted. When Anthem’s own reviewers and the state psychological associations agree that a documented 90837 should stand, that is air cover worth using.

For employers who buy these plans, the number on the contract is not the number your people experience. A plan that quietly reprices the longest, most complex visits is a plan that pushes clinicians out of network and your employees toward waitlists and out-of-pocket bills. Covered was never the same as cared for.

For everyone else, the takeaway is smaller and sharper. The loudest part of the insurance fight, the denial, is not the whole fight. The quiet part is the check that shows up looking fine and paying less than the work was worth. It is worth naming, because the things we cannot see are the things that get away with the most.

At Mental Wealth Solutions, we build tools that keep the clinician in control of the record, so the code that gets billed is the code the session earned. If you want to see how that works, book a call.

FAQ

What is downcoding in therapy billing? Downcoding is when an insurer pays a claim but reclassifies the service to a lower, cheaper code than the one submitted. The care still happened. A 53-minute session (CPT 90837) gets paid like a shorter 38-to-52-minute session (90834), or a complex office visit gets paid like a routine one. Because the claim is paid rather than denied, there is no standard denial to appeal.

Does Cigna’s E/M downcoding policy affect therapists? Cigna’s Evaluation and Management Coding Accuracy policy (R49), effective October 1, 2025, automatically adjusts certain higher-level E/M office-visit codes (99204-99205, 99214-99215, 99244-99245) down by one level and pays the lower rate promptly, per Cigna’s provider notice (2025). Those are the codes psychiatric prescribers and many behavioral-health providers bill for medication visits, often with a psychotherapy add-on. Standalone talk-therapy code 90837 is not on that automated list, but it faces a parallel pressure through insurer advisory letters.

What is a 90837 letter, and should I downcode to 90834? Anthem reviewed a year of paid claims, calculated the average use of 90837 by specialty in each market, and sent letters to clinicians who used it more than their peers, per The Insurance Maze (March 2025). Anthem called the letters “strictly educational.” Many therapists downcode to 90834 out of fear anyway. The APA Practice Organization and the Pennsylvania Psychological Association pushed back to say legitimate 90837 billing should not be penalized. If the session met the 53-minute threshold and is documented, the code is 90837.

How much money does a downcode actually cost? Under commercial insurance in 2026, a 90837 session usually pays about 15% to 25% more than a 90834 session, per MedsoleRCM (2026). In common commercial ranges, 90837 pays roughly $125 to $165 and 90834 roughly $100 to $135, per Upstate Healthcare Admin (2026). One downcode is a small cut. Across a full caseload, week after week, it is a standing pay cut the clinician never agreed to.

Sources

1. Cigna Healthcare, provider notice — “New Reimbursement Policy for Professional Evaluation and Management Services Claims effective October 1, 2025” (Provider Newsroom, 2025). https://providernewsroom.com/cigna-healthcare/new-reimbursement-policy-for-professional-evaluation-and-management-services-claims-effective-october-1-2025/
2. The Intake (Tebra) — “Cigna may start downcoding your E/M codes starting October 1, 2025” (2025). https://www.tebra.com/theintake/getting-paid/cigna-downcoding-e-m-codes
3. DNP Consulting — “Who Really Owns Headway, Alma and Rula, and Why Cigna’s Downcoding Rule Could Cost You” (2025). https://www.dnpconsulting.org/post/who-really-owns-headway-alma-and-rula-and-why-cigna-s-downcoding-rule-could-cost-you
4. Upstate Healthcare Admin — “Insurance Reimbursement Rates for Therapists in 2026: What CPT 90837, 90834 and 90832 Actually Pay” (2026). https://www.upstatehealthcareadmin.com/post/insurance-reimbursement-rates-for-therapists-in-2026-what-cpt-90837-90834-and-90832-actually-pay
5. MedsoleRCM — “90837 CPT Code: Complete Billing & Reimbursement Guide 2026” (2026). https://medsolercm.com/blog/90837-cpt-code
6. The Insurance Maze — “Did You Get a 90837 Letter?” (March 6, 2025). https://theinsurancemaze.com/90837letter/

---

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical, clinical, legal, or therapeutic advice, and reading it does not create a therapist-client relationship with Matthew Sexton, LCSW or Mental Wealth Solutions, Inc. Although the author is a licensed clinical social worker, the content in this article is not clinical assessment, diagnosis, or treatment.

Billing codes, downcoding and E/M coding-accuracy policies, insurer advisory-letter practices, and reimbursement rates vary by health plan, state, provider specialty, and contract, and may change after this article is published. Nothing here is a substitute for confirming a specific policy or rate with the payer, your billing or compliance team, or qualified counsel. Plans and circumstances differ, and what is described here may not match your situation.

If you are in immediate emotional crisis, you can reach the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988 (US). If you are experiencing domestic violence or are in physical danger, contact the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 or visit thehotline.org. In a life-threatening emergency, call 911.